Dakota War Captives Enumerated at Camp Release September 26 1862
Carrie Reber Zeman
For the table of names referred to in this report, see Camp Release List. Or see the list and report in a single PDF, Dakota War Captives at Camp Release.
On September 26, 1862, Col. Henry H. Sibley (1811-1891) accepted the release of 269 captives held for six weeks during Minnesota’s U.S.-Dakota War of 1862. The captives and their Dakota protectors had named the place Camp Lookout while they waited for Sibley to arrive. Sibley re-christened itCampRelease. Today, the National Register-listed site is outsideMontevideo,Chippewa County,Minnesota, on the Minnesota River opposite the mouth of theChippewa River.
Sibley’s scribe on the 1862 expedition was missionary Stephen Return Riggs (1812-1883). On October 11, 1862, Riggs wrote to his superior, Selah B. Treat, “…we came up to this point [Camp Release], which is ten miles below Lacquiparle, and here, from the camp of friendly Indians, we obtained the captives in their hands —to the amount of over one hundred whites, chiefly women and children, and one hundred and sixty odd half-breeds. There are a still a few [captives] in the hands of the Indians —some fifteen or twenty. The great part of these are way out in Dakota Territory.”
The table below compiles data from three extant lists of captives at Camp Release compiled by Riggs, designated R, P, and NR in the last column of the table.
R is a four page holograph in the Stephen Riggs Family Papers at the Minnesota Historical Society titled, “A List of the White prisoners and Half Breeds delivered at Camp Release Oct. 1862.” A note by Riggs at the bottom of page four tallies: “In all — white persons 107; Half-Breeds 162 [total] 269.” This list names captives freed between September 26 and October 1, 1862. It also includes the names of two mixed blood men who were subsequently tried for participation as Dakota insurgents during the war. The number following R/ in the last column of the table indicates the page number on which that individual appears. For example, R/2 is Riggs list page 2.
P appeared in The Saint Paul Press October 3, 1862. The section was headed: “The following is a list of captives delivered up to Col. Sibley, at Camp Release, opposite the mouth of the Chippewa River on Friday September 26, 1862.” The editor summarized this list as containing: “91 whites and the rest half breeds —but the latter are not all embraced in this list [appearing in the newspaper]. Probably the number will be over 100 whites and 150 half-breeds.” This list includes a pre-war place of residence for some captives, a town name like Beaver Creek. P was reprinted in many regional newspapers.
NR is “a list of captives delivered up to Col. Sibley, at Camp Release, opposite the mouth of the Chippewa on Friday September 26, 1862” located at the National Archives in Record Group 393. Like R, it appears to have been written by Stephen Riggs. NR is the most detailed list, containing the first names and ages of children as well as a place of residence for each captive. However the holograph is so aged that the data is barely legible. Where names of children are provided in the table below, they are typically derived from NR.
The lists do not precisely accord with each other due to the order in which they were compiled. NR represents the earliest extant list, probably dating to Sept 26 or 27, 1862. It contains the names of captives whose primary ethnic identity was “white,” including some people of mixed decent whose lifestyle was probably indistinguishable from that of their neighbors living off the Sioux Reservation. The wrapper indicates that NR was directed by General Henry Sibley to his superior, General John Pope.
P is presumed to be based on a copy of NR, although either Riggs or the newspaper editor shortened the list by naming the only the head of household (typically, a mother) and substituting “…and [ X number] children” in place of the children’s names and ages given on NR. It is logical that Sibley and Riggs would have sent a copy to the state’s leading newspaper. Not only were families hoping to find missing loved ones among the liberated captives –the alternative being that they were presumed dead –Sibley had been castigated in the Minnesota press for how slowly he proceeded to Camp Release. Publishing the names of safely freed captives was partial vindication of Sibley’s campaign strategy.
R represents a final summary Riggs compiled in early October, 1862 and preserved in the portion of Riggs Papers owned by the Minnesota Historical Society.
The table below does not capture the names of every person who may have been captive in 1862. More than 40 people reported having been held for a period of time (varying from several hours to several weeks) during the Dakota War, but were released or escaped before the majority of the captives were turned over on September 26, 1862. Three identified captives died in captivity. Sixteen more people were held beyond October 1, 1862. Several were released within a few weeks; several more in the spring of 1863. One was not freed until 1866. A few children, last seen captive, never returned.
Many people of Dakota decent are missing from this compiled list because they were not officially recognized as ‘captives.’ For example, Cecilia Campbell Stay’s written accounts of her captivity mention that her baby sister Stella and her Uncle Hypolite (Paul) Campbell, his wife Yuratawin, and their children John and Theresa were also held captive. Similarly, George Crooks reported that he, his parents (John and Mary Crooks) and his brother (Julius Crooks) were held captive and freed by Sibley at Camp Release. Yet they were not listed as captives in1862.
 For usage of “Camp Lookout” in letters dated before September 26, 1862 at Camp Release, see Renville, Mary Butler A Thrilling Narrative of Indian Captivity.Minneapolis: Atlas Company’s Book and Job Printing Office, 1863.
 S. R. Riggs to S.B. Treat Camp Release October 11, 1862. Northwest Missions Manuscripts and Index 1766-1926. The Minnesota Historical Society.
 Stephen R. Riggs and Family Papers, Box 1. The Minnesota Historical Society.
 The Saint Paul Press, October 3, 1862. Microfilm. The Minnesota Historical Society.
 Record Group 393, Part 1, Entry 3449. The National Archives.
 Statistics drawn from my database of 1862 captives.
 “Narrative 1: Cecilia Campbell Stay’s Account” in Anderson, Garyand Alan Woolworth, eds. Through Dakota Eyes; narrative accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862. St Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press 1988 p. 51-52.
 “True Facts About the Outbreak Between the Sioux Indians and Pioneers in 1862 as told to me by George W. Crooks, 81-year Old Sioux Indian.” Unpublished manuscript by Crook’s granddaughter, 1937. The Brown County [Minnesota] Historical Society.
Thank you for your excellent research. You have one person missing from the Riggs (P) list concerning the Krause family. Here is the Rigg’s entry (P) from the St. Paul Press: Mrs. Dorothea Crowsie and two children, Patterson’s Rapids – husband down below; one boy with the Indians.
Here are my notes on the entry: Mrs. Dorothea Crowsie and two children (Fred and Emma), Patterson’s Rapids (Sacred Heart settlement), husband down below (Frederick Krause, Fort Ridgely), one boy with the Indians. This “boy” was actually 12-year old Pauline Wallner Krause, Frederick and Dorothea Krause’s niece and foster daughter. They took her in when she was 7 after her parents died while they are all living in Posen Province, Prussia. Minnie Busse (Minnie Buce Carrigan) reported in her book that Pauline and Henrietta Nichols (who is also not in the lists) were still missing when the soldier’s came to Camp Release. Dorothea Krause stated that she would not leave Camp Release until Pauline was found. Then about two weeks later according to Minnie Busse (but maybe only about 5 days later according to some other speculation), Pauline and Henrietta came into camp and the soldier’s gave a cheer. I am descended from Pauline.
The Culver Fort Ridgely Refuge list for Frederick Krause does list wife and three children captured.
I am doing research to find out where Pauline and Henrietta might have been during that time period. Curt Dahlin finds it quite likely that they were the two German girls that Enos Good Hail brought in when the Sophia Josephine Huggins party started north (Sophia Josephine Huggins account). I am currently working to understand if this might be correct.
Thank you for sharing your research on your family, Gayle! I am at the National Archives this week doing research. I will email you with a question!
What happened to the Indians who surrendered?