1862 Trial 2: Te-he-hdo-ne-cha

For an overview of this series publishing the trial records of the 38 Dakota men executed at Mankato Minnesota on December 26, 1862, see the first post.

Tehehdonecha’s trial is the first of forty trials in this series.

Transcript: Trial 2 Te-he-hdo-ne-cha

Page Images: #2 Te-he-hdo-ne-che

Whiting-Ruggles Summary December 5, 1862

No. 2. TE-HE-HDO-NE-CHA.—Engaged in the massacres; took a white woman prisoner and ravished her.[1]

*****

Trial Record September 1862

[Trial #2 Te-he-hdo-ne-cha]

Proceedings of a Military Commission convened at CampRelease opposite the Mouth of Chippewa River by virtue of the following order:

Order No. 55                           viz:

                                                                                    Head Quarters Camp Release

                                                                                                September 28th 1862

             A Military Commission composed of Colonel Wm Crooks of the 6th Reg., Lieut. Col. Marshall of the 7th Regiment, Captains Grant & Bailey of the 6th Reg. And Lieut. Olin of the 3rd Reg. Will convene at some convenient point in camp at 10 o’clock this morning to try summarily the Mulatto, and Indians, or mixed bloods, now prisoners, or who may be brought before them, by direction of the Col. Commanding and pass judgment upon them, if found guilty of murder or other outrages upon the Whites, during the present State of hostilities of the Indians, the proceedings of the Commission to be returned to these Head Quarters immediately after their conclusion, for the consideration of the Col. Commanding.

The Commission will be governed in their proceedings, by Military Law and usage.

(Signed) H. H. Sibley

Colonel Commanding

[Frame 44?]

CampRelease opposite the

Mouth of Chippewa River, Minn.

Sept. 28 1862

The Military Commission met pursuant to the above order-

Present

Col. Crooks – 6th Reg. M. V.

Lt. Col. Marshall, 7th Regt. M.V.     Members

Capt. Grant, 6th Regt. M.V.

Capt. Bailey, 6th Regt. M. V.

Lt. Olin – 3rd Regt. M. V., Judge Advocate

Adjutant Heard – McPhail’s Mounted Rangers – Recorder

The Military Commission was then duly sworn and Te-he-dho – ne – cha a Sioux Indian was arraigned on the following specifications

Viz-

Charge and specification against Te-he-hdo-ne-cha, a Sioux Indian –

Charge –Murder –

Specification – In this that the said Te-he-hdo-ne-cha, A Sioux Indian did go upon a war party against the white citizens of the United States and did participate in, or by his presence and participation, direct and indirect, cause to be

[Frame __]

killed the Father, husband, and nephew of Martha Classen (sp??) on or about the 19th day of August, and the 28th day of September 1862 – This at or near Beaver Creek, Minnesota

Charge 2nd –Rape-

Specification. In this that the said Te-he-dho-ne-cha did forcibly ravish Margaret Cardinell, he, having been of the party who killed her father and brother in law on or about the 10th  [20th?] day of August 1862, when she was taken prisoner by the same party.

Witnesses –

Margaret Cardinell                                          By order of Col. H. H Sibley –

Harriet Vallant                                                                        S. H. Fowler

Lt. Col. – State Militia

A.A. Adjut.

And therefore the prisoner was asked what he had to say in answer to said charge, to which he made the following statement –

I don’t remember of killing any white persons, or committing any depredations, and that is the reason I am not with the other Indians.  I knew nothing of the killing of white at the Lower Agency until two days afterwards and then I went down there.  Myself and nine other went East of Beaver Creek.  Saw a wagon load of white people – the men ran off, and

[Frame 46?]

the other Indians ran after them.  This woman (Margaret Cardinell) is one of them.

I think there were ten (??) women and children there and the Indians wanted to kill them and I prevented it.  If I killed any she will know it.  I was compelled to go to the Fort and New Ulm.  Didn’t participate in the fight.  Went to the Fort twice but killed no one – was out of bullets at Birch Coolie, but came home  without firing again – was at Yellow Medicine at late battle, but did not fire a gun.  If I had killed a white man I would not be here.

I slept with this woman once.  I did bad towards her once – I tell you the truth – Another Indian may have slept with her.

Margaret Cardinal, a witness for the prosecution being then in Court, was duly sworn, and testified as follows:

The prisoner has slept with me.  He has raped me against my will –when I was taken prisoner and the third night afterwards.  This man was the same man who took me prisoner.

I did not see him kill anybody.

There were five Indians who came up where we were.  Three white men a woman and a little child ran into the woods, and this Indian and another staid by the wagon and every time there was a

[Frame 47]

war party this man went with. He was as ready to go as any of them and perfectly delighted –

Harriet Vallant, also a witness on the part of the prosecution was then called into court and sworn, and testified as follows –

I have heard the testimony of the last witness.  I was with her when she was taken – we were together at Mrs. Classen’s house – The three Indians, who ran off, came back, and said that they had killed two – This Indian was then present – He acted as if pleased at their success.  The party took away our provisions and would not give us any –

The testimony being closed the Commission was then cleared and proceeded to the findings and sentence –

The Military Commission after mature deliberation on the testimony adduced find the prisoner as follows:

Guilty of the specification of the first charge.

Guilty of the first charge.

Guilty of the specification of the second charge.

Guilty of the second charge – and do therefore sentence him the said Te-he-hdo-ne-cha, a Sioux Indian

[Frame 48]

to be hung by the neck until he is dead.

[Signatures of Commissioners and Recorder][2]

*****

Riggs Synopsis December 1862

1. Te-he-do-ne-cha. (One-who-forbids his house,) says he was asleep when the outbreak took place at the Lower Agency. He was not present at the breaking open of the stores, but afterwards went over the Minnesota river and took some women captives. The men who were killed there, he says, were killed by other Indians, whom he named.[3]

Transcriptions by Walt Bachman and Carrie Reber Zeman. Page views supplied by John Isch.


[1]Whiting-Ruggles Report to Abraham Lincoln December 5, 1862.

[2] Dakota Trials Records. Microfilm and holograph records in Center for Legislative Archives, U.S. Senate Records, National Archives. Transcription by Walt Bachman. See corresponding digitations of microfilm by John Isch.

[3] Mankato Independent December 26, 1862, “Confessions of the Condemned” p. 2. Editorial introduction reads: “Rev. S. R. Riggs has kindly prepared for us the following synopsis of conversations held with each one of the condemned prisoners, wherein is contained much interesting information.”

This entry was posted in 1862 Dakota War trials. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 1862 Trial 2: Te-he-hdo-ne-cha

  1. Jan Klein says:

    I appreciate your sharing these testimonies.I am the great-great granddaughter of Martha’s father-in-law, Charles Henry Clausen and his son Frederick is my great-grand uncle. Both were killed, and Te-he-dho-ne-cha was found guilty of their murders. My people were killed on August 18 and they were neighbors of the Cardinals. If he took Margaret hostage as he admitted, it must have been on the 18th when the Birch Coulie settlement was attacked and not the 20th. I have not read that any Dakota came back to that settlement after the 18th. I would be interested in any comments on the above.

    • Carrie Zeman says:

      Jan,

      Most of the women taken captive in Renville County were taken on August 18 & 19 –they returned to Renville County on August 19th –so your deduction is logical. The transcript is simply an attempt to decode the handwritten trial record. On the page images, it looks to me like Heard recorded the date as the “19th” in the first charge and the same event as happening on the “10th” in the second charge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s